Any merger of the US Canadian and Mexican dollar constitutes treason — Agree ?
Any and all persons who are engaging in or helping any form of common currency do so against the will of the people
And by doing so have betrayed the nation state in an act of treason and should be charged before the law and condemned to a prison term if found guilty
————————-
Do you agree ?
If you have somehow separated currency and sovereignty — I would love to hear the backwards logic it took to support that leap of programed faith
If this currency should merger say good bye to your national sovereignty
How much more of a definition of treason do you want — common currency = loss of your nation state
If that isn’t betrayal of the national interest beyond the measure any terrorist could do
What the F is ?
Treason
The attempt to over throw or destroy the rightful power of the governement
Merged currency — will end the power of the federal government completely
It is treason - by banker and their co-conspirators who ever they may be would by equally guilty
Now you tell me how much power your government will retain when they are one of 3 nations using that currency — it will end their power - and plots to support the ending of national sovereignty — is called Treason
— Well then none of you are going to mind your new 20 with Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth on it will you ?
************** When I asked if currency merger was treason all you Americans said no
http://ca.answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AiRcrQHt67.fith6C6vlfhHBFQx.;_ylv=3?qid=20081201085745AAig3kR
—————————-
Fine — welcome back the British Commonwealth - universal health care and nationalized schooling begins tommorow
And all your kids are going to start learning the real history of the world
Lets merge — go on — you Americans don’t think it is treason
Good — When your new Governor General is appointed by the Crown on advice from PM Obama — the title is His or Her Excellency
Related posts:
- Do you agree with the Mercer report regarding US Canadian currency mergers ? Because I think he sums it up very well M1a Rick Mercer is quoting Toronto Dominion Bank executive He is a comedian - on CBC Watched and enjoyed my Canadians...
- In a world where the Canadian dollar is worth 10 cents more than the U.S. greenback…..? Will Americans finally accept 1 and 2 dollar coins instead of paper money, which is more costly to make and is only in existence because one state has a huge...
- I have about $ 110 in Canadian , 700 mexican pesos, and $ 46 Euros , all in Coins.? I live in NY , where can I exchange these coins for US DOLLARS ?...
- Where could i exchange canadian and mexican currency for american money? i just found some coins in my drawer, is there any place to exchange them?...
- Canadian Dollar Higher Than American Dollar? Is it true? Link to currency conversion would be great! Thanks. ♥ BTW are you Canadian or American?...
Merging of currency would indeed constitute treason, servility to the bankers, and an attack on national sovereignity.
No… Treason is not defined by issues of setting the currency
_____Need "logic" about separation of currency v sovereignty - check the Euro
Ja!, mein Fuhrer.
Treason is traditionally defined as "giving aid and comfort to the enemy." This can be actually fighting with enemy troops, leaking sensitive information, etc. Unless Canada and Mexico are in some secret war, I’m guessing that you are getting a little carried away.
Well, Obama and Pelosi will make it happen under the Nazi regime so don’t question it.
Its not treason but it should be illegal…this is why a govt doesn’t give its monetary authorities to private entities.
Thinking and being progressive is treason?
No. You obviously don’t know the definition of treason.
NCLB strikes again.
Having a national currency has nothing to do with sovereignty. There are a number of nations without their own currency, yet they remain sovereign just the same. Panama uses the US Dollar, and Monaco has never had its own currency but honors pretty much any major world currency.
Not at all. Treason has nothing to do with currency, unless you are buying an overthrow of the government.
There are many forms of currency in the US. There are many nonprofit agencies that give credit for volunteer work. There are other groups that use this type of bartering for credit or goods.
Betrayal of the National Interest, would be starting an illegal war on pretenses, like the Bush crime family did.
Any combination of the currency of nations in North America would have to be approved by the governments involved. Just like the Euro.
The constitution is VERY clear and explicit about the US currency, and there is no possible way under existing constitutional law to merge our currency with any other.
Congress is explicitly charged with the duty of minting and printing the money, but it would not be the first time that they have given their responsibility to an illegal organization ( the Federal Reserve)
No…..it’s just a bad idea.
First off thinking "progressive" may be wrong if that progress leads to destruction of our freedom and sovereignty. While we are on topic with sovereignty; Those who compromise the sovereignty of the Citizens of the United States, are themselves enemies of the United States, whether they perform this act with a gun or with a pen. And those enemies if they are are themselves Citizens, and especially should they hold public office under oath are performing a treason against the United States, as any weakening of the Sovereign of our great nation, constitutes giving aid and comfort to enemies of the United States. Unifying currency however is not necessarily a treason depending on the system. For instance the US was on the gold standard, which was essentially a shared money, however, sharing the money in this case, while it led to volatile economic markets, did not give foreigners strong control over our economy. However, a combined governance of a fiat currency similar to the US Federal Reserve Notes currently used as currency, could be treasonous if control over the money supply is strongly influenced by other sovereigns who could subsequently use that control over our currency to weaken our economy.
I have no problem with your rationale, but like all things in politics, it is not a black versus white issue. I would be interested in knowing how Europe compromised themselves to accept a common currency and by-passed the thorny issue of treason. It would seem that a common currency in Europe has been accepted while countries still maintain their sovereignty.
So if we could use the European experience as a starting point, what would be the benefits of a common currency?
Secondly, who would benefit? If we could put the treason issue to one side for a moment, I would not support such a proposal if it benefited one country over the other. If this was a US proposal, I would be mighty suspicious of their agenda. This is like the elephant and TWO mice instead of seeing Canada as the lone mouse.
However, from another point of view, a common currency would probably produce a more level playing field around the price of goods and services. If that is the intent, it may be a good idea.
Back to the treason issue. When you kill the language, you kill the culture. But if you kill the currency, do you really kill the sovereignty? I can’t answer that question because of the European experience, but if it does, I would not support a common currency.
I think we in Britain should deface the Queen on all the notes with a pencilled in Hitler moustache.
US and Canada? Fine
Until the Mexican Government is only as corrupt as the USA’s is. They can not be a part.
Any allusion to Sovreignty goes right out the window, if a Nation does not have control of its Currency. So I suppose if it goes through, it will be an act of Treason to all three Countries. And while they are arguing out the Legalities of it all, everyone concerned will be getting Fleeced.
Again..